Parties Trade Accusations, Raising Concerns About Judicial Independence

The rivalry between the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and the All Progressives Congress (APC) escalated recently, over the 2023 election tribunal rulings. PDP National Chairman Umar Damagum accused the judiciary of bias in upholding APC victories in states like Lagos and Kano, alleging overlooked evidence of electoral fraud. At a press conference in Abuja, Damagum called for judicial reforms to protect democracy. APC’s Felix Morka responded, defending the rulings as reflective of voters’ choices and accusing PDP of undermining judicial credibility. 

The disputes, centered on gubernatorial and legislative seats, are now before the Supreme Court, with outcomes likely to shape Nigeria’s political future. Analysts warn that the heated rhetoric risks deepening polarization, especially as parties gear up for 2027. Civil society groups, including the Transition Monitoring Group, urged restraint and respect for judicial processes. 

The controversy has sparked national debates, with social media platforms buzzing with divided opinions. Some Nigerians support the judiciary’s independence, while others echo PDP’s concerns about fairness. The rulings’ implications extend beyond the courtroom, affecting state-level governance and party strategies. Stakeholders are calling for electoral reforms to prevent future disputes, emphasizing the need for stronger institutions. As tensions rise, the nation watches closely, aware that these battles could influence public trust in democratic processes.